It's a celebration of all things geek, from stabbing books to scissors to aliens and must have android apps. Plus, if you're also a geek, there is a chance to Guest Blog.
Hope everyone had a relaxing weekend!

Natasha Larry liked my first guest post so much (Thanks Tasha!) I've decided to do another :) I'll try to make this a weekly thing, though anything could come up (like I'm going to be in an amateur movie where I play a Star Fleet officer and help people speak Klingon :-).
Shameless plug: My book The Newfoundland Vampire will be on in April 2012 and Tasha’s books (the second one I’ve read and highly recommend) are out now.
Enough promotion though. So like lots of people I am a huge fan of Buffy: The Vampire Slayer. It is one of the only things I liked Sarah Michelle Gellar in (aside from a couple of movies, I haven't seen the newer show she did) and one of Joss Whedon’s best (and most successful) TV shows. Also like most people I was sad to see it end and delighted when Joss began doing Buffy: Season 8 in comic book format.
I thought the concept of a teen-age/adult vampire slayer was a clever one and of course her having a thing for vampires is a great twist.
The neat thing about the comics is Joss (or whomever does the writing) can do anything they want. There’s no worry about getting the actors, money, special effects or any of the other traditional show/movie constraints.
To be honest I haven’t read all the comics, I only just finished Volume 4 but I think I’ve read enough to comment on them.
Volume 1: excellent story. Great to have the whole gang back, super-sized Dawn was a nice twist. Xander is funny as always.
Volume 2: Very interesting story. I always loved the Faith character, a flawed slayer who screwed up but still has the powers. Giles recruits her to do the kind of work Buffy won’t.
Volume 3: My favorite (so far). How can you not love Xander being buddies with Dracula? Even though the Count doesn’t have a soul he sure has style! (and unique powers). Like any vampire fan I've always been a huge fan of the Count (he's in my book in a rather unique way =) and I was happy to see that Buffy hadn't really killed him during the show. To top this volume off it off Dawn gets in a fight with a super-sized robot version of herself, in Japan! A hilarious tribute to the Godzilla movies and a treat for any Buffy/anime/Godzilla fan.
Volume 4: Very good story. I have always admired Joss’ ability to make up new languages for a story (he did a great job of this for an episode of “Dollhouse” and of course everyone in “Firefly” had a unique way of speaking.) The future slayer time bubble twist was cool and I liked how we all got to travel back with Buffy to her high school days in the final dream chapter.
I’ve heard rumors of this series getting crappy but it hasn’t happened yet. I’m along for the ride Joss, someday I’ll have to catch up with Angel and Firefly comics as well.
Talk to you all next week and feel free to check out my own blog where I do lots of movie/book reviews.
Way Back When. When
I was a kid, I liked reading comic books. In fact, I drew my own comic books. My
mom had a friend who read romance comic books, kind of like the old strip
comics in the newspaper, but in color. She left some behind, and I read those,
but I liked the superhero comics better, even though they didn’t have very many
female characters that weren’t villains. I loved the idea of superheroes –
people that could do extraordinary things for good. I went gaga over Japanese
TV cartoons way before I realized it was called anime. The Japanese animation
dramatized lighting and perspective more forcefully than American cartoons, and
this depth and drama fascinated me. In fact, I learned to draw people by
copying the style of Japanese animation. But back then (we won’t say how long
ago), it was hard to come by cartoons on TV that featured Japanese animation.
This was the BC/BS TV era (Before Cable / Before Satellite), when antennas
ruled the rooftops. To compound the problem, I lived in a semi-rural area.
Luckily I was just close enough to a major metropolitan area to get fuzzy
reception of the ‘indie’ channel that featured oddball stuff like Japanese
anime cartoons. So my comic books were hand-drawn in pencil on lined notebook
paper, starring characters with minimalistic facial features and big eyes.
Different Mediums and
Mixed Effects. Soon I ‘graduated’ to books without pictures, basically
because my sisters left science fiction books lying around, which I’d pick up
and read but half the time didn’t understand or appreciate to the fullest. I
was in fifth grade, so some of the adult and technological-concept content was
beyond my level of comprehension. However I did find there was much more ‘meat’
to the stories in books without pictures, because there was much more room for
layered narrative. But I still missed pictures. Sure, I could imagine the
characters in my head, but I loved art and liked to look at amazing pictures
with weird perspective and bizarre lighting to highlight characters in odd and
unexpected ways. I have been known more than once to buy a book just because
there was something about the cover art I admired or fell in love with. So art
can have a powerful effect on the reader and shouldn’t be dismissed as inferior
or ‘cartoonish,’ just for kids. Comic books can have a story depth that rivals
traditional novels.
Comprehending and
Interpreting. Graphic stories in the ‘typical’ comic book style present
ideas in a visually defined form that is instantly comprehensible. The pictures
tell you what’s going on without your having to first squint and read a couple
paragraphs of words. The mind absorbs and processes visual imagery and words differently,
using different parts of the brain. So writing and illustrating are a bit
different from each other, just as motion pictures present a totally different
medium with sequential movement and audible content added – and sometimes
subtitles. Words by their nature require language skills and verbal
interpretation. Pictures on the other hand are mostly visual with very little
language skill involved, except to read captions and dialog.
What’s in a Name?
There’s an ongoing debate in the graphic novel arena over what actually
constitutes a graphic novel. Some artists and writers balk at the term, because
they think it is either unnecessary or is just a fancy euphemism to dress up a
medium they feel is respectable in its own right without a different label.
Writer Neil Gaiman, responding to a claim that he does not write comic books
but instead writes graphic novels, said the commenter “meant it as a
compliment, I suppose. But all of a sudden I felt like someone who'd been
informed that she wasn't actually a hooker; that in fact she was a lady of the
evening.” –Wikipedia.
The Traditional Comic
Book. One camp differentiates the graphic novel from the comic book by
means of binding (book binding rather than saddle stapling) and story
completeness, while maintaining that a graphic novel is in the same boxed
picture frame format with bubbled narration. Traditionally comic book editions,
while presenting an ongoing series in more or less complete mini-story, are far
shorter than graphic novels. There have been many sources of content for
graphic novels and comic books over the years, and often publishers of comic
books would cross over to the other medium and ‘bundle’ several issues as a graphic
novel, mostly to get more mileage of the same content already published.
I further differentiate between illustrated novel and
graphic novel by the content itself. If the pictures are the predominate
feature and take precedence over the narrative, then it’s a graphic novel. If
the narrative, the story itself, takes precedence over the illustrations, then
it is an illustrated novel. Of course this is simply my personal take. You can
call it whatever you want, as many do, but however it’s labeled, the mix of illustrated
story provides a rich reading experience. As they say, a picture is worth a
thousand words.