Another installment of PARANORMAL WIRE Tuesday Tips and Tidbits...
|  | 
| Andrew Arrosmith's REALMS OF BELIAR fantasy | 
Okay, yes, I admit that  ‘sophisticating’ is not an acceptable and recognized word. However, in  this case it was used to shorten the blog title and – hey – get you to  take a look and say WHAT?  The real purpose of this post is to discuss how and why writers think  they need to add an air of sophistication to their writing.
Adding foreign phrases.  The first and most obvious way a lot of novice authors attempt to add  sophistication to their writing is by inserting famous French quotes or  adding dialog in French to one or more of their characters. Because ...  everyone knows the French are way more sophisticated than rude and uncultured Americans (wink-wink). Verstehen Sie? (Oops, sorry, that was German.)
While  adding a line of foreign language here and there to establish character  traits is fine, a little can go a long way. This is especially true  when the typical reader will not have an immediate understanding of the  meaning of those phrases. The best practice is to put the foreign phrase  in context so that the meaning, without proper translation, can be  inferred from what is going on in the story. However, problems may crop  up when the author isn’t fluent in the foreign language being used – but  some readers out there are. Nothing is more embarrassing than having a  reader point out improper usage or syntax when the author pulled the  foreign phrase off some web site like freetranslation.com.
Create a unique style.  Edward Estlin (E. E.) Cummings, famous poet who was also a painter and  fiction author, wrote many of his poems in all lowercase letters. This  became a trademark of his that made his work easily recognizable. And  anyone who used that same ‘gimmick’ would immediately be branded as a  shameless copycat. This type of stylistic artifice, however, can  sometimes work against an author when the artistic style overwhelms the  content and substance of the writing. For instance, writing an entire  novel in a stream-of-consciousness style with run-on sentences that may  go for paragraphs or even pages, can make reading the work a tedious  chore for most readers, many of whom won’t put up with that for very  long, and simply stop reading. That’s the last thing a writer wants his  readers to do. So add an artistic style only if it can be done  exceedingly well and seems essential to characterization, for instance  if the novel is being told from a first-person point of view (I did this, I saw that), similar to William Faulkner’s style.
Everything plus the kitchen sink.  Sometimes an author thinks it’s necessary to put everything conceivable  into a novel in order to make it seem deep and worthy of highest  regard. Foucault’s Pendulum  by Italian writer and philosopher Umberto Eco seems to be just such a  book. Mr. Eco may not have deliberately overwhelmed his convoluted story  with arcane and obscure details (including lengthy explorations of the  Kabbalah, alchemy, and conspiracy theories involving the Templars)  because he thought it was the only way his book would gain critical  attention. He may have in fact included these details as a result of his  own philosophical explorations and studies. However, for the typical  reader, keeping track of all that was going on in the book required a  score sheet or index to refer to in frequent times of confusion. The  total effect of reading it was like stepping into a very organized  hoarder’s labyrinth – with no way out. While it was an oftentimes  fascinating read with new twists and turns in every manner imaginable,  it also required great effort to keep up with and simply read.
Purple Prose.  There’s always the attempt to add sophistication to one’s writing when  dealing with characters who are supposed to be upper-class or genteel.  Historical novels often suffer from an overabundance of fancy,  overinflated, ten-dollar words, ‘beautiful’ turns of a phrase, or polite  euphemisms. While this can be an appropriate treatment to give a proper  feel for the characters in a specific time period, oftentimes it has  the opposite effect of adding sophistication, and actually makes the  reader giggle or roll her eyes. While careful writing can add a sense of  personality to a character through narrative style and artful dialog,  it should be done with restraint so the tone is perfect – not overdone  like a burnt cake buried under a ton of sticky-sweet icing.
Just get out of the way.  Oftentimes the best way to write your story is the straightforward,  no-nonsense approach. This is true of thrillers and much horror, and can  work well for just about any other genre. The objective is for the  author to remain invisible and get out of the way while showing the  reader the story. The basic competency of the author’s writing will  create a sturdy foundation over which the story can be built floor by  floor to soar like a strong and glistening skyscraper. But if the author  spends so much time trying to pretty up the writing (the foundation)  with artful and sophisticated techniques, those added gewgaws may  obscure a clear path to the elevator, so the reader never gets to visit  the top floors of the soaring skyscraper story and see the wonderful  vista the author had envisioned. Sometimes simplicity and directness and  an economy of words can be a style all its own that readers will enjoy  and appreciate – because it allows them to read the story instead of  noticing the fancy way the author worded things.
So...  Whatever writing approach you choose, make sure it’s a good fit for  your story – then get out of the way and let the reader read it.
Pat Morrison, Penumbra Publishing
 
 
4 comments:
It is more fun to spoof 'sophisticating.'
My favorite french quotes are Napoleon's clearing the streets of rabble with a "whif of grape," and "let them eat cake" by Marie Antoinette, to the peasants.
"Off with their heads" is a nice quote, too, although not as sophisticating.
That's Walt - clearing the streets with a whiff of spoof...
Pat
You know...I think many things about the French...just not "sophistication"
=) This is great advice. I got a lot of comments about it on face book.
Interesting you mention Umberto Eco and 'Foucault's Pendulum', Natasha. I'm in the middle of reading this myself. No stranger to the occult and mysticism (my first novel, Maranatha, is based heavily upon alchemy and ancient Gnostic philosophy), but there are times when even I find myself having to remember that I;m reading a novel, and not a philosophical treatise. (Incidentally, your comments also ring quite true - as a recent reviewer of Maranatha recorded very similar observations). I'm still expecting to be overwhelmed by Eco's actual story, however - I throughly believe it's one of those books which may be a lot of work, but which rewards it all in the end. Let's compare notes when we're finished!
Post a Comment